Judge Allan Goodman has ruled in favor of Fix the City\u2019s landmark suit concerning the Hollywood Community Plan.<\/p>\n
The lawsuit was the first of three suits filed by Los Angeles area civic organizations.\u00a0 The other two were filed by the La Mirada Avenue Neighborhood Association and SaveHollywood.Org.<\/p>\n
Fix The City\u2019s suit sought to invalidate the Hollywood Community Plan approval based on numerous grounds including the failure to use the most recent census data and inconsistency with the City\u2019s General Plan requirement that infrastructure be monitored and be able to support development.\u00a0 In a meticulously detailed ruling, the Judge supported each of our contentions.<\/p>\n
Fix The City filed suit on the Hollywood Community Plan as it represented a dangerous precedent for other community plan updates which are either in process or are planned, including those for the Mid-Wilshire area and West L.A.<\/p>\n
Jim O\u2019Sullivan, VP of Fix The City said: \u201cCommunities throughout the City know that the infrastructure has been unable to keep up with the demands placed on it.\u00a0 Most importantly, our first-responders are stretched thin.\u00a0 Also important is that the livability of the City is impacted by deteriorating streets, increased traffic and cuts to key departments such as Rec & Parks.\u00a0 The first step in fixing the City is to have accurate data.\u201d<\/p>\n
Perhaps the most important aspects of today\u2019s ruling by Judge Goodman were his findings on the General Plan and the requirement that Community Plans properly implement the infrastructure monitoring aspects of the General Plan.\u00a0\u00a0 He said:<\/p>\n
\u201cThe City’s Revised Findings reveal how the Plan Update twists the monitoring requirements in Framework Policy 3.3.2 (the infrastructure monitoring policy) ….. The City’s position is that the Plan Update sufficiently addressed the infrastructure capacity of the area such that no further monitoring is required during implementation of the Plan Update. This hands-off policy is completely contrary to the Framework Element’s objective of continuous monitoring of development activity<\/i>.\u201d<\/p>\n
As part of its General Plan, the city promised to monitor the infrastructure and to put building controls in place if any infrastructure element was threatened.\u00a0\u00a0 Many of the city\u2019s community plans clearly describe the required monitoring and mitigation.\u00a0 They state:<\/p>\n
\u201c\u2026if this monitoring finds that population in the Plan area is occurring faster than projected; and, that infrastructure resource capacities are threatened, \u2026 and, that there is not a clear commitment to at least begin the necessary improvements within twelve months; then building controls should be put into effect, for all or portions of the [] Community, until land use designations for the Community Plan and corresponding zoning are revised to limit development.\u201d<\/p>\n
If even more clarity is required, the city provided it in their mitigation description for the General Plan.\u00a0 They stated:<\/p>\n
\u201cLastly, the policy requires that type, amount and location of development be correlated with the provision of adequate supporting infrastructure and services\u201d<\/p>\n
In fact, the City itself argued Fix the City\u2019s position in the late 90\u2019s when the General Plan was challenged in court.\u00a0 The city stated:<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat became clear was that a crucial feature of dealing with growth impacts was contained in the GPF \u2013 its program for timing allowable development with available infrastructure\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
Unfortunately, the City failed to implement its own policy and the City and its residents are now facing the predictable result:\u00a0 A failing infrastructure which results in a loss of services and decreased public safety.<\/p>\n
Fix The City is represented by Beverly Palmer of Strumwasser and Woocher.<\/p>\n
The Fix The City suit is not related to or targeted at any existing or proposed development projects, nor does it comment on any other environmental review other than that of the Hollywood Community Plan..<\/p>\n